Palliative Medicine

Background: The quality of palliative care in non-designated cancer hospitals, where approximately 70% of deaths of patients with cancer occur, remains unevaluated. This study aimed to clarify the quality of palliative care in these hospitals by comparing patient characteristics and evaluating the quality of palliative care provided by bereaved families. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among bereaved family members of patients with cancer who died in 2018 at designated and non-designated cancer hospitals (excluding palliative care units). We compared the two groups regarding patient and bereaved family characteristics, quality assessment of palliative care (including Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale [MSAS]), care satisfaction, and the presence of end-of-life discussions. Results: In total, 27,944 bereaved family members agreed to participate. The mean age at death was 73.2 ({+/-}11.9) and 79.7 ({+/-}10.9) years for designated and non-designated cancer hospitals, respectively (p < 0.001, Effect Size [ES] = 0.55). The mean MSAS total score (symptom intensity) was significantly higher for designated cancer hospitals than for non-designated cancer hospitals, even after adjusting for patient characteristics (p < 0.001, ES = 0.39). Conversely, the mean adjusted overall satisfaction was significantly higher in non-designated cancer hospitals (p < 0.001, ES = 0.21) than in designated cancer hospitals. Conclusions: Non-designated cancer hospitals had older and less symptomatic patients than designated cancer hospitals. However, there was no significant clinical difference in the quality of palliative care, as assessed by the bereaved families.

Background Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma will be the 2nd-most common cause of cancer mortality by 2030. It is associated with rapid deterioration, severe symptoms, and significant quality-of-life concerns. Using input from patients, family caregivers (FCGs), and provider stakeholders, we designed an intervention, PAL-CHW-PDAC, delivered by a community health worker that involves proactive symptom monitoring and management, care navigation, and disease education. Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of 60 patients with newly diagnosed PDAC (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) and their caregivers at Loma Linda University Health from 09/2025 to 05/2026. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the PAL-CHW-PDAC intervention (6 CHW visits over 3 months) or an attention control. The control comparator involved receiving standard handouts and videos on pancreatic cancer, along with check-in visits with research staff. The primary outcome was symptom burden, defined using the NCCN/FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL) measured by the FACT-Hep and psychological distress (measured by the NCCN-Distress Thermometer). Caregiver outcomes included burden, preparedness, quality of life, and psychological distress. Results: 60 out of 74 eligible (81%) were enrolled. The median age was 71, 60% of patients were Hispanic. 68% of patients presented with metastatic PDAC, 23% with borderline resectable disease and 9% with resectable PDAC. There was a trend towards improved symptom burden at 12 weeks (mean increase of 5.3 points vs. decrease of 3.2 points; p=0.093) with the intervention compared to the attention control. The intervention group also had improved psychological distress at 12 weeks (3.31 vs. 5.95, p=0.01), caregiver psychological distress (3.26 vs. 6.86, p<0.001) and caregiver preparedness (2.92 vs. 2.11) at 12 weeks. Telehealth utilization for symptom-focused visits improved with the intervention (82%) compared to the control. (14%, p=0.01) Hospice utilization also improved with the intervention (41% vs 7%, p-0.12). Conclusions: A pilot RCT of the PAL-CHW-PDAC intervention demonstrated preliminary efficacy with a trend towards improved symptom burden, psychological distress, and caregiver psychological distress and preparedness. A larger definitive clinical trial is needed to understand the impact of this promising intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT07591571

Context Despite widespread use of medical cannabinoids for cancer-related symptom management, systematic reviews consistently call for more clinical trial evidence. Objectives This study aimed to determine and explore responses to medical cannabis extracts for cancer-related symptoms using patient-centred methodology. Methods An aggregate N-of-1 study of clinically stable but symptomatic outpatients from 8 Canadian cancer centres, comparing three blinded sublingual extracts (THC; CBD; 1:1) with placebo, self-titrated within a prescribed schedule for four consecutive days each in randomized sequence for up to three cycles (total 16-48 days). The primary outcome was the frequency of at least a 1.4-point (20%) improvement in a 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for at least one extract over placebo. Results The primary outcome was achieved in 50/89 (56%) participants (p<0.001), with no significant preference of one extract over another on average, but a clear preference between extracts for most individuals. Changes in a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment score and participant preference (n=91) confirmed these findings. Improved sleep, tiredness and anxiety contributed most to the overall improvement regardless of primary symptom. There were no demographic predictors of response. Mild adverse effects were common with all extracts including placebo but resolved rapidly on dose reduction/cessation. Moderate/severe adverse effects were rare but associated with THC. Conclusions Medical cannabis extracts can be meaningfully beneficial for cancer-related symptoms in approximately 50% of patients, particularly for sleep and related symptoms. A starting dose of 2.5mg of THC/CBD three times a day was well-tolerated. Personalization of treatment is required to optimize response.

Aims Moral distress has been studied across many health arenas; however, public health has often been overlooked. Canada is facing a healthcare crisis with a significant number of staff leaving the healthcare field. This study explores the experiences of moral distress in public healthcare practitioners across Canada. Better understanding these experiences can provide insights into how to support staff and prevent attrition in public health. Methods This was a cross-sectional qualitative study. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted between May and July 2023, through remote and in person methods. Participants were from nursing, social work, medicine, and dietetics, all working in public health across Canada. Iterative thematic analysis was used. Emergent themes were compared within and across data sets and by participant age and years of experience. Results/Findings Experiences that contributed to moral distress included systemic powerlessness, political and ideological overreach, unethical work environments and undervalued expertise. Years of experience and diversity in gender and ethnicity impacted how practitioners navigated moral distress. Experiences where practitioners felt actions went against their values increased during the pandemic, contributing to moral injury. Conclusions This study situates the unique position of public health within the health system and explores experiences of moral distress both during and outside the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic brought the concept of moral distress to the forefront of many peoples minds, these experiences existed prior. Addressing the underlying causes will contribute to establishing approaches to support public health practitioners suffering from moral distress and injury.

Background People with severe mental health conditions (SMHC) and caregivers in South Africa experience high rates of poverty. The PRIZE feasibility trial found that recovery groups were broadly acceptable and feasible and potentially effective in reducing relapse. Addressing economic needs was identified as a means to increase impact. This study aimed to understand experiences of financial insecurity and acceptability of poverty alleviation interventions as an adjunct to psychosocial interventions amongst people with SMHC and caregivers. Methods We conducted two focus group discussions and 12 in-depth interviews in isiXhosa with a total of 14 people with SMHC and 13 caregivers who had participated in PRIZE in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Results We identified four major themes. Theme 1: Financial insecurity as a defining influence on life. We found that financial security was crucial to recovery, through bringing status and dignity. However, participants experienced substantial financial insecurity, which impacted on social and mental wellbeing. Financial insecurity was entrenched due to fractured and violent communities, cycles of debt and stigma amongst employers. Theme 2: Government disability grants are not a panacea. Difficulties accessing disability grants included problems attending assessments and rejection of applications. Whilst they were generally welcomed, receipt of disability grants sometimes caused problems such as increased stigma and family disagreements about how the money should be spent. Theme 3: Group savings offer conditional hope if carefully managed. Several caregivers had longstanding experiences of stokvels (community-based credit unions). However, some were fearful of group members absconding with funds. Participants emphasised that trust, safety and fairness are essential for successful group savings. Theme 4: Income-generating activities are desired but need capital and come with safety concerns. Many had ideas and motivation for small businesses but stressed the need for financial capital, skills training and financial literacy support. There were serious concerns that owning a business or gaining wealth could make one a target of crime. Conclusion Poverty alleviation interventions could positively impact on the wellbeing of people with SMHC and caregivers in South Africa as an adjunct to psychosocial interventions and psychiatric care. Approaches could include supporting access to social protection or existing savings groups, and nesting new savings groups or income generation initiatives into psychosocial interventions. Any model would need to incorporate robust mechanisms to ensure the safety of participants. All approaches would be enhanced by parallel social and public health interventions to build social capital and reduce violence in neighbourhoods.

Background In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service is attempting to address the ongoing challenges to heath equity in underserved children and young people (CYP) by creating Neighbourhood Multi-Disciplinary Teams (NMDTs) that combine health services, social care providers, local authorities, voluntary, community and faith and social enterprise is needed. Despite this significant shift in the delivery of care, there is a lack of suitably robust evidence of family experience to inform their development. This work contributes to this need using the experience and perspectives of families using the experience and perspectives of families using an early example of an NMDT for CYP the Sparkbrook Children's Zone in Birmingham, United Kingdom. Methods The study used data collected from two focus groups conducted with parents whose children had been treated by the Sparkbrook Children's Zone. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis to populate Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results In summary and by framework domain, we found that that individuals became aware of the SCZ through a range of sources, understanding that it was multidisciplinary if sometimes unsure of precisely the organisations involved (Intervention coherence) Parents described the benefits to access of a locally situated collocated service (Burden) the personalised relationship with providers (Cultural sensitivity0 extended conultation time, and support for the family's complex clinical needs (Perceived effectiveness) Conclusions Parents appeared to prefer the SCZ over usual primary care but more work is needed with larger sample sizes to ensure that the structure of NMDTs are understood and optimised.

BackgroundBreast cancer is an increasing public health concern in many low- and middle-income countries, yet prevention and care decisions do not consistently rely on evidence. In Mali, patient associations are increasingly visible in cancer advocacy, but their potential role in mediating research and experiential knowledge within decision-making remains poorly understood. This study adopts a systemic perspective on knowledge transfer to examine the conditions under which a patient association-led knowledge intermediation mechanism could plausibly emerge and be embedded within breast cancer governance. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative pre-implementation study based on 29 semi-structured interviews, one focus group, and participant observation involving patient association members and leaders, health professionals, researchers, decision-makers, international partners, and media representatives. Data were analysed using an adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide construct-based coding, followed by cross-domain analysis to identify clusters of interacting determinants synthesised into broader analytical configurations. ResultsAnalysis identified three configurations shaping the plausibility of patient association-led knowledge intermediation in breast cancer governance, across institutional, organisational, and epistemic dimensions. First, fragmented institutional arrangements, project-based financing, and discontinuous coordination limit the stabilisation of interfaces and continuity of interactions, thereby constraining the emergence of sustained knowledge transfer processes. Second, patient associations hold strong experiential legitimacy and mobilisation capacity, but their ability to assume intermediation roles is constrained by stigma, limited confidence in engaging with scientific and policy-relevant knowledge, restricted access to data and analytical resources, and weak integration into institutional decision-making spaces. These constraints are also shaped by gendered illness trajectories and social expectations that affect womens ability to engage publicly and the recognition of experiential knowledge as policy-relevant evidence. Third, competing framings of cancer problems, combined with institutional norms privileging biomedical and quantitative evidence, narrow the range of knowledge considered actionable, limiting the integration of experiential and contextual knowledge into decision-making. Together, these configurations identify the interdependent conditions shaping the emergence, functioning, and durability of association-led knowledge intermediation mechanism. Without simultaneous alignment of institutional, organisational, and epistemic conditions, intermediation is likely to remain partial, episodic, and weakly sustained. ConclusionThese findings suggest that association-led KT cannot rely on patient associations alone, nor on capacity-building alone. It requires implementation strategies that build structured interfaces enabling patient associations, researchers, clinicians, and decision-makers to jointly interpret and translate heterogeneous forms of knowledge into actionable inputs, while addressing the gendered conditions of womens engagement and the uneven recognition of experiential knowledge in institutional evidence use. Further research is needed to test how such relational configurations can be operationalised and sustained in constrained health systems.

Given the growing crisis in youth mental health, there is a critical need to rebuild and sustain healthy social environments. Cooperative experiences (e.g., sports, clubs) may promote mental health but we lack rigorously tested measures to drive research and evaluation. This study sought to develop a measure of cooperative experiences and test associations with health. We developed and revised a measure of cooperative experiences based on interdisciplinary literature and 20 cognitive interviews. We recruited youth aged 13-25 years (N = 262) through youth-serving organizations and snowball sampling to complete an investigator-administered (n = 50) or self-administered (n = 212) survey assessing cooperative experiences (48 items), mental and physical health, and demographics. We assessed item characteristics, dimensionality, reliability, and construct validity. Multivariable linear regressions were used to estimate the association between the total score and self-reported health. Participants were 57% female, 69% Latino, 55% high school students, and 25% college students. The measure was reduced to 35 items (alpha = 0.90) with six subscales: sense of a unified group (7 items, alpha = 0.83), goal alignment (3 items, alpha = 0.80), inclusion and shared purpose (10 items, alpha = 0.88), social exclusion (2 items, alpha = 0.91), positive interdependence (7 items, alpha = 0.77), and negative interdependence (6 items, alpha = 0.87). A higher total score was associated with better self-reported mental health (beta = 0.25 standard deviation change in health score for each standard deviation change in cooperation scale, 95% CI [0.108, 0.394], p = 0.001) and self-reported general health (beta = 0.25, 95% CI [0.107, 0.395], p = 0.001). The study provides preliminary support for the reliability and validity of a new measure of exposure to cooperative experiences among youth. The measure holds promise as a tool to examine the relationship between social environments and health outcomes in real-world settings.

Youth in the United States are experiencing growing mental health challenges, yet many face barriers to accessing timely, affordable, and stigma-free support. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have become widely available and are increasingly being used by young people as tools for information seeking, coping, and self-reflection. This brief report explores how youth are engaging with AI chatbots for mental health support, drawing from qualitative interviews conducted in New Jersey. Nine semi-structured interviews were completed with participants ages 19-22. Thematic analysis revealed five core themes: (1) generational change, peer communication, and humor as coping and normalization tools; (2) internal and external barriers to self-recognition and help-seeking; (3) AI chatbots as a safe and accessible first step; (4) AI chatbots as a tool for filling information gaps; and (5) limits of AI chatbots and the preference for human connection. These findings indicate that young people see AI chatbots as private, judgment-free starting points for exploring their emotions and seeking early support. However, they also recognize that these tools cannot replace human connection or professional care. For public health, this presents both challenges and opportunities in utilizing the accessibility of AI chatbots while ensuring ethical design, cultural responsiveness, and protections that safeguard youth privacy and equity.

BACKGROUND: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends routine enquiry about domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in maternity care. We aimed to explore patterns and predictors of DVA enquiry during routine first antenatal care ( booking) appointments with midwives in South East London. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study using cross-sectional data collected through the St Thomas Hospital midwifery service between 1st January 2019 and 31st March 2023. Pseudonymised data were extracted from maternity records, comprising demographics, mental and physical health information, social factors, and DVA enquiry. We used linear mixed modelling to test associations between predictors and DVA enquiry. RESULTS: The dataset comprised 7,932 booking appointments with 7,007 women (median age: 32 years; ethnicity: 52% White, 27% Black, 7% Asian, and 15% other). Enquiry was made about current experiences of DVA in 79.4% of appointments. Black-identifying women (OR=1.28, 95% CI [1.11,1.46]) and those born in Sub-Saharan Africa (OR=1.37 [1.14,1.64]) were more likely to be asked than white-identifying and UK-born women. Single women were more likely to be asked than married or cohabiting women (OR=1.22 [1.08,1.38]). Those living in more deprived neighbourhoods were more likely to be asked (OR=1.07 [1.01,1.14]). Multivariable modelling found that being born in Sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Europe, and living alone but with additional support were all associated with increased DVA enquiry, while being born in North America or requiring an interpreter were associated with decreased enquiry CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations for routine DVA enquiry during all booking appointments, a substantial proportion of pregnant individuals were not asked between 2019 to 2023. Predictors of DVA enquiry reflected practical barriers (e.g. language), and known or perceived predictors of DVA risk (e.g. deprivation). Our findings suggest that midwives consciously or unconsciously prioritise DVA enquiry for women they believe are at greatest risk, against national guidelines.

Introduction: Large-scale free-text data with socio-demographic information can capture nuanced accounts of lived experience that are difficult to detect in structured measures. However, manual qualitative analysis is difficult to scale, while automated approaches may obscure subgroup variation or introduce bias. This is especially relevant for large language models (LLMs), whose use in qualitative health research is increasing despite limited evaluation in socio-demographically stratified analysis. Objectives: This study examined how socio-demographic differences in health and wellbeing experiences were manifested in a large-scale free-text dataset, and evaluated how different AI-assisted analytic approaches identified these differences. Specifically, it aimed to: (1) identify socio-demographic differences using Machine-Assisted Topic Analysis (MATA); (2) compare MATA outputs with topic modelling combined with LLM-based topic interpretation; and (3) examine potential bias in LLM-based analysis. Methods: We analysed 2,177 valid free-text responses from the UK COVID-19 Wellbeing Tracker, a longitudinal survey of adults recruited during the pandemic. Responses described factors influencing health behaviours, mood, and wellbeing over time. Data were preprocessed and stratified by gender, age, and socioeconomic status (SES). MATA combined topic modelling, using Latent Dirichlet Allocation, with humanled qualitative interpretation of topic keywords and representative responses. The same topic model outputs were then interpreted using an LLM for comparison. Potential LLM bias was assessed using a demographic label-swap crossover design, with bias evaluated through Jaccard lexical similarity, VADER sentiment, and NRC emotion analysis. Grounded Review and Assessment of Computational Evidence (GRACE) was used to evaluate the AI outputs. Powered by Editorial Manager(R) and ProduXion Manager(R) from Aries Systems Corporation Results: MATA identified meaningful socio-demographic thematic differences in pandemic-related mood and wellbeing across gender, age, and SES. Common themes included disruption, adaptation, uncertainty, routine, and the influence of work, relationships, and health on wellbeing. Male-stratified topics emphasised routines, habits, and coping with external pressures, whereas female-stratified topics were more relational and reflective, focusing on connection, isolation, family wellbeing, and anxiety. Lower SES narratives included practical strain, financial pressure, and loss of control, while higher SES narratives more often reflected adjustment, autonomy, and meaning-making. Older adults described health, gratitude, and family connection, whereas younger adults emphasised work-related stress and competing demands. LLM-based interpretation broadly reproduced the high-level subgroup patterns identified through MATA, but outputs were more generalised, less conceptually differentiated, and showed greater thematic overlap. Bias analysis showed systematic shifts in vocabulary, sentiment, and emotional tone when demographic labels were swapped, suggesting a risk of representational bias. Conclusions: MATA identified meaningful socio-demographic differences while retaining interpretative depth at scale. LLM-based topic interpretation showed utility for rapid thematic summarisation, but produced less conceptually differentiated outputs and was sensitive to demographic framing. The analysis also identified "LLM speak", where outputs appeared coherent but relied on abstract, generalised, and overlapping interpretations. Human oversight, structured qualitative appraisal, and explicit bias evaluation are necessary when using LLMs to analyse socially stratified free-text health data.

Background: Adults with severe mental health conditions (often referred to as severe mental illness, SMI) experience 15 to 20 year mortality gap relative to the general population, with lung cancer a significant contributor. National cancer policy targets earlier diagnosis but does not explicitly address how pathways function for this group. Aims: This study aimed to describe lung cancer risk, prevalence, screening eligibility, referral activity and diagnostic pathway performance for adults with SMI in South East London (SEL), and to examine where along the pathway inequalities arise. Methods: Co-designed with experts with lived experience and voluntary sector, this exploratory mixed-methods service evaluation combined quantitative analysis of routinely collected data from the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF), SMI Register and Cancer Waiting Times Record (April 2023-March 2024) with semi-structured qualitative interviews (n=11 clinical staff) and focus groups (n=6 adults with lived experience of SMI). Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and framework-based thematic analysis respectively, and findings were integrated using a joint display approach, organised by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: Lung cancer prevalence was approximately double among adults with SMI (0.17% vs 0.09% in the general population). Despite Urgent Suspected Cancer (USC) referral rates being more than twice as high in the SMI population (63 vs 28 per 100,000), fewer cancers were detected via planned general practice (GP) routes (11% vs 20%), the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard was not met for any SMI patient diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period; overall FDS performance was 76% in the SMI population compared with 84% in the general population; and appointment non-attendance was more than double that in the general population (6% vs 3%). Qualitative findings identified individual, service and system-level mechanisms, including stigma, diagnostic overshadowing, fragmented coordination, and rigid pathway protocols, that compound disadvantage across lung cancer pathway stages. Conclusions: Inequality in lung cancer outcomes for adults with SMI accumulates across the pathway rather than arising at a single point of failure. Addressing this requires proportionate adaptations within existing cancer pathways, alongside routine reporting of cancer outcomes stratified by SMI population. Keywords: severe mental health conditions, lung cancer, health inequalities, cancer screening, diagnostic pathway, mixed methods

Background: The ECAIL trial, launched in 2017, targets hard-to-reach families and evaluates a multicomponent childhood obesity prevention intervention. At a maternity hospital in Lille, France, healthcare providers screened pregnant women experiencing social vulnerability, and dietitians delivered a home-based intervention until age 2. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a six-month suspension in 2020. This study compared eligibility and participation before the pandemic and after resumption, and examined how the pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crisis shaped implementation and reach. Methods: We analyzed 5,744 eligibility questionnaires distributed at the maternity ward. Inclusion criteria included [&ge;]1 indicator of social vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, precarious housing, or social isolation). To capture implementation experiences, a psychosocial researcher conducted a focus group with six dietitians delivering the intervention; it was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically focusing on reach, acceptability, and adaptation. Results: Eligibility increased from 29.7% (n=955) prepandemic to 33.6% (n=849) after resumption, while the distribution of vulnerability criteriaremainedsimilar across periods:78.3% received social/medical benefits; employment was not the main source of household income for 58.7%; 24.4% experienced financial hardship; 14.7% reported social isolation; 6.0% lived in precarious housing; and 19.0% had three or more vulnerabilities. Participation among eligible women remained stable (24.6%; n=443). Qualitative findings indicated dietitians satisfaction and participants enthusiasm for the resumption of home visits, particularly in addressing social isolation. After resumption, the introduction of a pre-visit COVID-19 questionnaire reduced missed appointments. Converging qualitative and quantitative findings indicated sustained, and in some cases strengthened, provider engagement despite pandemic-related strain on hospital services. Conclusions: This study shows that a complex intervention can maintain reach and acceptability through adaptive implementation under major contextual disruptions.The rapid resumption of home-based services emerged as a robust strategy for engaging and retaining socially disadvantaged families, highlighting the importance of flexible, context-sensitive approaches during social and economic crises.

Background/Objectives People living with HIV face overlapping hardship through medical, behavioral, and social needs that require an integrated and coordinated approach. Harlem United multiservice model provides healthcare, food assistance, housing support, harm reduction services, behavioral health counseling, case management, and much more to support their clients. This study is an examination on how the participation in the Harlem United multiservice model is associated with changes over time in client health, behavioral health, and social outcomes. Methods This study performed a longitudinal program evaluation examining Harlem United clients enrolled between January 2020 and January 2025 who remained engaged in services for a minimum of one year. Client outcomes were assessed across three time points: Baseline, Year 1, and Year 2. The sample included 154 clients at baseline (N=154) with a total of 428 observations (N=428). Quantitative measures that were assessed included program involvement, housing stability, PHQ4 scores, food insecurity, medication adherence, and viral suppression. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics through descriptive statistics, frequency tables, and generalized estimating equation models (GEE) to account for repeated observation over time. Results Medication adherence and viral suppression remained consistently high across all time points in the longitudinal study suggesting that most clients were virally suppressed or undetectable at baseline. Housing stability was statistically significant Wald X2 (2) = 156.073, p < 0.001 with improvements noted in Year 1 and Year 2 compared to baseline. Program level was significantly associated with PHQ4 scores, Wald X2 (1) = 7.902, p = 0.005. Food insecurity was also associated with PHQ4 scores, Wald X2 (1) = 5.462, p = 0.019. Findings suggest that clients with higher PHQ4 scores were involved in more programs compared to clients only enrolled in 1-2 programs. Additionally, clients with higher PHQ4 scores were more food insecure highlighting the relationship between social needs and mental health. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the Harlem United multiservice model played a supportive role in the maintenance of health and social outcomes through medication adherence and viral suppression. Although, significant improvement was not reflected across several outcomes, the association between PHQ4 scores, food insecurity, and an increase in program involvement suggest that the multiservice is reaching more clients with complex behavioral and social needs. Continued integration of these services is important for sustaining client stability while addressing social determinants of health.

Background Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent, and associated with worse clinical and psychosocial burdens. Interoception, the brain's ability to sense and interpret internal bodily signals, may contribute to multimorbidity, through its link with health behaviors, stress regulation, and mental health. This study examines whether self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention is associated with multimorbidity, by identifying multimorbid subgroups and their interoceptive profiles. Methods Morbidity classes were identified through latent class analyses in two Dutch survey datasets, focusing on depression and alexithymia (DA-dataset; N = 671) and lifestyle factors (L-dataset; N = 1022). Linear regression analyses were used to assess interoceptive accuracy and attention (by the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and Interoceptive Attention Scale respectively) among different subgroups. Results Multimorbid subgroups were characterized by older age, low socioeconomic position, and elevated physical, psychological, and behavioral problems. Multimorbid classes exhibited lower interoceptive accuracy (DA-dataset: B = -1.14, 95% CI = [-2.89, 0.62]; L-dataset: B = -2.36, 95% CI = [-3.83, -0.89]) and higher attention (DA-dataset: B = 3.62, 95% CI = [0.97, 6.27]; L-dataset: B = 1.07, 95% CI = [-1.42, 3.56]) compared to healthier classes. Conclusion Multimorbid populations demonstrated lower interoceptive accuracy and higher interoceptive attention. This highlights the psychosocial complexity of multimorbid populations which may impact their self-management and health behavior. These findings underscore the need to expand treatments to include psychosocial domains for multimorbid patients.

Background: Persons with disabilities, particularly deaf individuals, remain a largely overlooked population in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming globally, with this gap especially pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Deafness imposes substantial barriers to accessing information and services that are routinely available to hearing peers, further exacerbated in the post-COVID-19 era. This study assessed deaf adolescents' knowledge of and access to SRH education and services in Wakiso District, Uganda, and explored systemic, institutional, community, and adolescent-level factors shaping access. Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted at Wakiso Secondary School for the Deaf from July 2022 to January 2023. Quantitative data were collected from 70 consecutively sampled deaf adolescents aged 13-19 years using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through key informant interviews (KIIs) with four purposively selected stakeholders and a focus group discussion (FGD) with deaf adolescent students. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results: The mean participant age was 17 years (SD {+/-}1.8); 65.7% were female. A large majority (88.6%) had heard of SRH components, and 98.6% perceived a need for SRH education or services. However, 84.3% reported challenges accessing these services at least 85% of the time. No participant had ever received SRH education or services through a formal health facility. The FGD revealed that adolescents' conceptualisation of SRH was narrow, centred on body hygiene and HIV prevention, while service-seeking was reactive and symptom-driven. Five cross-cutting themes emerged from the KIIs and were reinforced by FGD findings: communication barriers; inadequate and inaccessible services; family and community isolation; existing platforms and positive practices; and negative provider attitudes and limited capacity. The school nurse emerged as the sole functional SRH access point for most participants. Conclusion: Despite high awareness and near-universal perceived need, deaf adolescents in Uganda face profound multilevel barriers to SRH access. Structural, psychosocial, and knowledge-related barriers interact to exclude this population from formal health services. Findings call for disability-responsive SRH integration into health systems, training of health workers in accessible communication, community capacity building, and co-design of SRH programmes with deaf adolescents.

Background Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are major contributors to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and are unevenly distributed across populations, disproportionately affecting migrants and ethnic minority groups. Somali communities in the UK experience multiple structural and socio-economic disadvantages; however, evidence on physical activity and associated inequities remains limited. This study examined physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and related barriers and facilitators among Somali residents in Sheffield, United Kingdom. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted among Somali adults (n = 238). Quantitative data were collected using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. Qualitative data were obtained from two focus group discussions (n = 14) and analysed using inductive thematic analysis to explore socio-cultural, environmental, and structural determinants of physical activity. Results No statistically significant predictors of physical activity were identified in the adjusted analysis; however, consistent trends indicated lower activity levels among older adults and those in employment. Qualitative findings revealed multiple, intersecting barriers rooted in structural inequities, including migration-related lifestyle changes, reduced incidental activity, sedentary occupations, limited health literacy, language barriers, financial constraints, and gendered responsibilities. Cultural norms and environmental conditions further shaped behaviour. Facilitators included community-based, culturally tailored interventions, peer support, gender-sensitive programmes, and adaptation of traditional practices. Conclusion Somali residents in Sheffield face overlapping structural and socio-cultural barriers to physical activity that are not fully captured by quantitative measures alone. Equity-oriented, culturally competent, and community-led interventions addressing both systemic and behavioural determinants are essential to improve access to physical activity and reduce health inequalities and NCD risk.

Background: Access to dental care remains a significant challenge for many children in Canada, particularly among low-income and underserved populations. The Interim Canada Dental Benefit (CDB), introduced in October 2022, aimed to reduce financial barriers to oral health care for children under 12 years of age while the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP) was being developed. While emerging evidence has examined program uptake, limited qualitative research has explored parents and caregivers experiences with the Interim CDB. Objective: This study aimed to explore parents and caregivers experiences with the Interim CDB in Manitoba, Canada, including awareness, access, perceived benefits, challenges, and recommendations for program improvement. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 30 parents and caregivers of children under 12 years of age. Participants were recruited primarily through community dental clinics. Interviews were conducted between July 2023 and February 2024, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to identify key themes and subthemes. Results: Seven interconnected themes were identified: (1) limited and uneven awareness of the Interim CDB; (2) inadequate and inequitable communication strategies; (3) barriers to accessing the benefit, including misconceptions about eligibility and complex application processes; (4) dental providers as key facilitators of access; (5) financial relief and improved access to care; (6) gaps in coverage and ongoing financial strain; and (7) participant-driven recommendations for improvement. While the benefit was widely perceived as reducing financial barriers and enabling access to care, challenges related to awareness, communication, and adequacy of coverage limited its overall effectiveness. Participants emphasized the need for improved communication from government, simplified application processes, expanded eligibility, and increased financial support. Conclusion: The Interim CDB represents an important step toward improving access to dental care for children in Canada. However, this study highlights critical implementation gaps related to awareness, accessibility, and coverage. Addressing these challenges will be essential to ensuring the success of the new CDCP and advancing equitable access to oral health care.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the barriers and facilitators experienced by non-U.S. born persons during the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in primary care settings, including the impact of culturally and linguistically congruent care navigation. Design: 25 interviews with non-U.S. born patients, along with focus groups and surveys with 31 primary care team members and leadership, were conducted. Setting: The study was conducted within a network of Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinics. Participants: Participants were adult non-U.S. born patients with LTBI and FQHC care team members. A purposefully selected subsample of randomized participants was interviewed. Intervention: Care navigators followed participants randomized to receive care navigation after a positive test for tuberculosis (TB) infection and offered health navigation and education about the importance of TB screening and treatment. Method: Data collection was followed by thematic analysis guided by a critical ideological paradigm. Results: Culturally and linguistically congruent navigation emerged as central to potentially reducing barriers, fostering trust, and improving treatment continuity. Participants without navigation support reported confusion and disengagement from care, while those with culturally aligned navigators described clarity and comfort, with influence overall by intrinsic motivation, relational support, and culturally shaped beliefs about care. Conclusion: Care navigation that includes culturally and linguistically congruent navigators whenever possible may help increase LTBI treatment completion among non-U.S. born populations. Limitations of the study include the potential influence of cultural norms, power dynamics, and selection bias.

Background: Many mental health problems originate in childhood, highlighting the need for early preventive approaches. Preventive services to promote children's mental health are offered in the health, education, and social sectors (H-E-S) but are often not used by certain at-risk groups or early enough. To identify children at-risk and provide needs-oriented support, professionals from all sectors must be well trained, collaborate closely to refer to specialized services for specific mental health problems or risk factors, and understand the regional psychosocial support system and its services. A comprehensive approach to preventing mental health problems requires structured planning and a systematic overview of all institutions and services in the region and their collaboration. This study aims to map the preventive mental health and psychosocial support service system and the collaboration between institutions across three sectors (H-E-S) in two exemplary city districts. The study is integrated into a whole-district approach to child mental health promotion that is being implemented in one of the researched city districts, and its results will inform further activities there. Methods: We use a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with a quantitative survey to map psychosocial services for children aged 4 to 10 and their families across the H-E-S sectors in two socioeconomically disadvantaged city districts in East and West Germany. All institutions that potentially offer psychosocial services for children and families will be approached to recruit professionals (e.g., schools, practices, counseling centers). To understand the regional psychosocial support system, we will analyze existing services and their characteristics (e.g., target groups, intervention types) descriptively. Social network analysis will be applied to gain an in-depth understanding of collaboration between institutions, to identify potential gaps in services and pathways, and to inform an intervention aimed at improving interinstitutional and intersectoral collaboration. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively analyze regional preventive psychosocial support systems for children and families across sectors at the community level. Previous mappings of psychosocial services have focused on a single sector (e.g., health) or specific diagnoses only. The psychosocial preventive landscape spanning the H-E-S sectors involves complex financing structures and referral logics. Understanding the characteristics of the existing support landscape requires a systematic and comprehensive approach. Our study advances service mapping and operationalization methods in public health research. Additionally, the findings will inform recommendations for improving comprehensive prevention approaches in the selected city districts.