Palliative Medicine

Objectives To explore the acceptability and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) using Alpha-Stim AID as a potential intervention for anxiety associated with breathlessness in people with advanced chronic respiratory disease. Methods A multicentre, mixed-methods, non-randomised interventional feasibility study with a parallel usual-care control group. Participants were adults with chronic respiratory disease and significant anxiety and breathlessness symptoms (assessed via Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale) receiving care from hospice services. The intervention groups used Alpha-Stim AID for eight weeks either at a fixed or personalised dose, followed by a four-week follow-up period. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Results 12.5% of screened patients at the primary site were eligible, and 29 unique participants were recruited. Three participants withdrew from the study (10.3%), none of which were attributable to CES. Most adverse events were mild, with headache reported frequently across control and intervention groups. Outcome measure completion was high, with data missingness below 6.4%. Numerical rating scales of anxiety and breathlessness fluctuated daily and remained broadly static, whereas GAD-7 scores assessing anxiety improved over time across all groups. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Conclusion CES using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services and was generally acceptable and tolerable among participants who enrolled. Our findings support further evaluation which should involve a fully-powered randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES provides clinically meaningful improvements in anxiety for this patient population.

Background Falls are a major safety concern in healthcare. In palliative care, patients are particularly vulnerable due to complex symptom burdens and rapid physical decline. However, standard falls risk assessment tools, primarily designed for acute clinical environments, rely on static risk scores and lack efficacy in hospice settings. The Falls Early Warning Score (FEWS) is a observational tool developed to address the specific contributing factors and complex needs of palliative patients. Aims To explore and understand staff views regarding the implementation, utility, and benefits of the FEWS tool to identify people at risk of falling in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted at a UK hospice. Healthcare professionals with clinical experience using the FEWS chart completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their confidence, practice, and perceived barriers. Questionnaire outcomes informed subsequent face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were evaluated using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Eleven staff completed the questionnaire, and five participated in interviews. Three major themes were identified: (1) Education, highlighting staff preferences for 1:1 training and the necessity of dedicated user guides; (2) Location and format of the FEWS tool, contrasting the data collection benefits of electronic formats against the bedside accessibility of paper charts; and (3) Recognised benefits of the FEWS tool, including its ability to prompt safe staffing levels, highlight variable patient presentation, and mitigate the emotional and physical impact of falls. Conclusions It is feasible and highly acceptable to integrate bespoke falls risk assessment tools into palliative care. By addressing the unique complexities of hospice patients, customised tools like FEWS can empower staff and support dynamic clinical decision-making. Further research is required to evaluate their clinical efficacy in reducing falls.

Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy. Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care. Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy. Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights. Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.

Introduction People with severe mental illness (SMI) and learning disabilities (LD) experience significant health inequalities, with diet-related conditions contributing substantially to early and preventable death. Despite high levels of nutritional risk, the presence and effectiveness of nutritional screening in mental health (MH) and LD settings remains under-researched. This study aimed to investigate nutritional screening practices in UK inpatient MH and LD services from the perspectives of dietitians. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted using a novel 22-question online survey. Data was collected via the British Dietetic Association Mental Health Specialist Group (April-June 2025). Quantitative data was analysed descriptively and qualitative data by reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated and presented thematically. Ethical approval was granted by Teesside University (2025Mar26544). Results Forty-seven dietitians participated, most with substantial dietetic experience, from a range of MH settings. Screening practices were widely established and supported by policy and audit. However, participants reported low confidence in screening translating into meaningful patient care. Barriers to screening included appropriateness of available tools, time constraints, difficulty engaging distressed patients and poor prioritisation of physical health. Digital integration and wider infrastructure were also important. Dietitians rarely undertook screening directly, instead holding secondary or leadership roles, while screening was most often completed by nursing staff who were often perceived to place limited importance on the process. Existing tools, particularly the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), were viewed as insufficiently capturing the broader nutritional risks relevant to MH/LD populations, leading some services to adopt bespoke, unvalidated tools. Conclusion Concerns regarding the suitability of existing nutritional screening tools in MH/LD settings are consistent with previous literature. However, we suggest cautious use of unvalidated bespoke tools. Whilst there was no clear front runner, MH specific tools such as the St Andrews Nutrition Screening Instrument (SANSI) and the NutriMental Screener warrant further evaluation. Importantly, findings indicate that optimising tool choice alone is unlikely to improve screening effectiveness. Nutritional screening must be embedded within clear care pathways, supported by organisational leadership, digital infrastructure, and multiprofessional engagement to move beyond procedural completion and support meaningful clinical action to improve patient care.

Background Agenda-setting is a fundamental patient-centered communication practice in which a clinician works with a patient to elicit, propose, and organize topics for discussion during a clinical encounter. Various agenda-setting interventions have been developed, including patient-facing tools and clinician training, but their effects have not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to determine the effects of these interventions on encounter, patient, care partner, and clinician outcomes. Methods We searched grey literature and seven databases, including PubMed, from inception through July 2025 for randomized and non-randomized comparative studies of interventions designed to promote or improve clinical visit agenda-setting. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. We assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. We conducted random effects meta-analyses when outcomes were sufficiently comparable, assessed heterogeneity using I2, and rated certainty of evidence using GRADE. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses examined study design, adjustment status, and intervention structure. Results Twenty-nine articles describing 22 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, including 13 randomized and nine non-randomized studies. Agenda-setting interventions increased the occurrence of agenda-setting (risk ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06 to 14.28, I2=34.6%) and favored the intervention for concerns addressed when measured as a continuous outcome (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.57, I2=65.3%) and overall clinician satisfaction (SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78, I2=0.0%). There were no clear differences in the number of concerns raised (mean difference (MD) 0.21, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61, I2=59.6%), visit duration (MD 0.64 minutes, 95% CI -0.83 to 2.12, I2=51.4%), or overall patient satisfaction (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.15, I2=47.0%). Potentially important heterogeneity was present for four of these six outcomes. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses did not provide clear evidence that effects varied by study design, adjustment status, or intervention structure. Risk of bias was often high, serious, or critical, and certainty of evidence was low or very low for all pooled outcomes. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive synthesis of clinical visit agenda-setting interventions. Such interventions may increase the occurrence of agenda-setting and the extent to which patient concerns are addressed without increasing visit length. However, the certainty of evidence was low or very low, and the available evidence does not establish a superior intervention structure.

Background Effective communication during consultations is facilitated by clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and can enhance patient satisfaction with care, alleviate symptoms, and improve quality of life. However, primary care systems are under significant strain and changing rapidly, which may affect practitioners' ability to communicate empathically and convey realistic optimism, with implications for the patient-practitioner relationship and patient outcomes. Understanding patients' perspectives of healthcare communication in the current clinical context is therefore important. We aimed to explore patients' experiences and perceptions of communication in UK primary care consultations, focussing on the communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Methods A qualitative interview study was conducted as part of a multi-centre cluster-randomised trial of EMPathicO, a brief e-learning package for Primary Care Practitioners (PCPs) on communicating clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Participants were not aware whether their general practice had access to EMPathicO or not. Interviews were conducted within 7-14 days of participants' consultations, explored their views and experiences of clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and were transcribed verbatim. Interviews were analysed using Ritchie and Spencer's Framework Method. Results We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded qualitative telephone interviews with 71 participants from 29 primary care practices taking part in the EMPathicO trial. Following comprehensive mapping of data to the framework derived following initial analysis, four themes were agreed. Overall, most participants described positive empathic consultations with their PCPs, however, participants' experiences were shaped by wider systemic and contextual factors. They described a stretched and inefficient primary care system impacting empathy and optimism; the impact of PCP 'preparedness' as a marker for empathy; how consultation modality (i.e. in-person or telephone) shaped perceptions of empathy, and how PCPs sharing next steps in participants' treatment and management could foster realistic optimism. Conclusions While clinical empathy and realistic optimism may be experienced by patients during consultations with practitioners, the wider contextual challenges of accessing and navigating primary care systems can threaten overall perceptions of feeling cared for. Future primary care policy and workforce training must consider these system pressures to preserve effective communication in consultations and positive patient-practitioner encounters.

Background: Trauma-informed approaches (TIAs) are increasingly implemented across public-sector settings to improve support for young people affected by adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). However, practitioners often report difficulties translating broad trauma-informed principles into everyday practice, and young people are rarely involved in developing resources intended to support implementation. Aim: To co-design, implement and undertake a preliminary evaluation of a youth-led trauma-informed resource for professionals working with young people in public-sector settings in England. Methods: The study formed part of the UKRI-funded Attune programme and employed Accelerated Experience-Based Co-Design (AEBCD). Eighteen adolescents with lived experience of ACEs and 16 professionals from nine public-sector settings participated in three regional co-design workshops. Findings from a prior arts-based lived experience study informed the workshops. Participants collaboratively developed Validating Voices, a low-cost resource designed to increase validating interactions between professionals and young people. The resource was subsequently introduced into nine organisations and evaluated using staff surveys and semi-structured interviews. Results: Co-design participants identified professional invalidation of young peoples experiences, identities, needs and emotions as an under-recognised contributor to mental health. The resulting resource combined discussion cards, creative activities, role-play and organisational reflection exercises to promote validating practices. Five organisations implemented the resource and reported it to be feasible. Flexible local adaptation was common, while more participatory role-play elements proved harder to implement consistently. Staff observed increased opportunities for disclosure, reflection, peer connection and professional curiosity about young peoples experiences. Staff reported listening differently to young people and, in some settings, implementing changes in response to young people's recommendations. Conclusions: Youth-led co-design identified validation as a practical and meaningful mechanism for operationalising trauma-informed principles in everyday professional practice. With refinements, Validating Voices shows promise as a resource to support more relational, collaborative and trauma-informed responses to young people in public sector settings.

Insomnia is a transdiagnostic risk factor for depression and anxiety and frequently co-occurs with both conditions. Sleep restriction therapy (SRT) is considered a key active component of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), is now delivered without therapist involvement via digital platforms such as SleepFix. Existing meta-analytic evidence suggests that digital behavioural therapy for insomnia (dBT-I) may improve anxiety and depression, but participant-level evidence remains limited. This individual participant data meta-analysis pooled data from two Australian randomised controlled trials (dBT-I n=220; control n=270; 78.3% female; mean age 66.0 years) to examine whether dBT-I, with SRT as the central component and delivered through the SleepFix program, reduces depressive and anxiety symptoms in adults with insomnia disorder, who were not specifically selected for anxiety and depression. We measured anxiety using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Geriatric Depression Scale-15, with depression scores standardised to a common scale assuming a shared standard deviation of 4. We fitted linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for participants and trials at Weeks 8 and 16, including baseline GAD-7 (mean 6.1, SD 4.8) in the anxiety model. dBT-I significantly reduced anxiety at Week 8 (mean difference -0.94 GAD-7 points, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.09, p=.030) and Week 16 (-0.94 GAD-7 points, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.02, p=.044), and depression at Week 8 (-0.40 SDs, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.14, p=.003) and Week 16 (-0.44 SDs, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.17, p=.002), with no evidence effects diminished between timepoints. However, the reductions were less than the smallest detectable difference for these questionnaires (i.e., 1 point). These findings support dBT-I as a scalable intervention with modest mental health benefits extending beyond insomnia.

Objective: To examine if food insecurity moderates the relationship between rurality and mental health outcomes (suicide mortality, poor mental health days, frequent mental distress) and to assess if these effects vary across U.S. Census divisions. Methods: This county-level (n=2,397) cross-sectional study used OLS and spatial error regression to analyze public data from sources including the County Health Rankings and USDA. We modeled suicide mortality, poor mental health days, and frequent mental distress as functions of the Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) and food insecurity, controlling for median income and provider rates. The suicide model was also tested across nine U.S. Census divisions. Results: Baseline models revealed a paradox: rurality was a direct risk factor for suicide (B=0.400) but protective for poor mental health days (B=-0.224). The national multivariable model revealed a significant, positive rurality-food insecurity interaction for suicide mortality (B=0.861), indicating a synergistic risk. This interaction was not significant for general mental distress, which was more strongly predicted by income and food insecurity. Regional analysis confirmed the suicide interaction was potent in five divisions, including the Pacific (B=3.048) and Mountain (B=1.712) , but absent in others (e.g., South Atlantic). Conclusions: The drivers of suicide are distinct from those of general mental distress and are geographically heterogeneous. The interaction of rurality and food insecurity creates a compounded risk for suicide. Suicide prevention must be regionally-tailored and address structural inequalities, such as food insecurity, alongside clinical care.

Background: Immigrant patients with limited dominant-language proficiency may face intersecting challenges when navigating cancer care and long-term oral anticancer treatment. Although studies have reported lower medication adherence among migrant and ethnic minority populations, less is known about how migration-related, linguistic, experiential and contextual factors shape treatment engagement from patients own perspectives. This study explored how immigrant patients experience illness, navigate treatment and engage with oral anticancer medication within the broader context of cancer care. Methods: Thirteen immigrant patients with limited dominant-language proficiency receiving oral anticancer medication for haematological malignancies were recruited from the haematology outpatient clinic of a Belgian university hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in participants native languages using an adapted version of the McGill Illness Narrative Interview, with professional interpreters or intercultural mediators. Interviews were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis within an interpretivist framework. Results: Analysis of patients illness narratives generated five experiential dimensions: 1) bodily, biographical and identity rupture; 2) temporal disruption and uncertainty; 3) linguistic vulnerability shaping the illness experience; 4) meaning-making and explanatory frameworks; and 5) resources sustaining treatment engagement. Linguistic vulnerability shaped access to biomedical knowledge, participation in healthcare encounters and patient autonomy, while patients mobilised personal, relational, existential, linguistic and institutional resources to sustain treatment continuity. Treatment engagement emerged as a dynamic and relational process embedded within broader migration-related, linguistic and healthcare contexts. Rather than representing fixed determinants or sequential stages, the five dimensions formed an evolving configuration whose relative salience varied throughout the illness trajectory. Conclusion: This study proposes a multidimensional interpretive model of engagement with oral anticancer medication among immigrant patients with limited dominant-language proficiency. Rather than conceptualising adherence as an isolated individual behaviour, the findings show how migration-related contexts shape the conditions under which treatment engagement becomes possible, difficult or fragile. By foregrounding immigrant patients lived experiences, the study identifies experiential, linguistic, relational and structural dimensions of cancer care that are difficult to capture through behavioural adherence measures alone and offers insights for more equitable, context-sensitive and patient-centred oncology care.

Objective: We examined whether perceived stress and sleep quality mediate the association between social support and later cognition among adults in the United States. Methods: We used longitudinal Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) data. Social support (1995-1996) was modeled as a latent construct indicated by family and friend support. Perceived stress and sleep quality were measured in the MIDUS 2 Biomarker Project (2004-2009), and cognition was assessed in MIDUS 2 and MIDUS 3. Structural equation models evaluated parallel indirect pathways, adjusting for MIDUS 2 cognition and covariates. Results: Higher social support was associated with lower perceived stress ({beta}=-0.32, 95% CI:-0.41, -0.23) and better sleep quality ({beta}=-0.25, 95% CI:-0.35, -0.15). Greater perceived stress was associated with lower cognition ({beta}=-0.06, 95% CI:-0.11, -0.01), whereas sleep quality was not associated with cognition. Direct and total social support-cognition associations were not statistically significant. A small positive indirect association through perceived stress was identified ({beta}=0.02, 95% CI:0.00, 0.04); no indirect association through sleep quality was identified. Conclusions: Findings are consistent with a possible psychosocial pathway through perceived stress, although the effect was modest and total and direct associations were not statistically significant. Sleep quality showed no statistically significant indirect association.

Preventive health is a crucial health systems component for managing disease burden and achieving health promotion policy goals. However, effective prevention relies on the modification of relevant risks, often requiring systemic health behaviour change. Australia's National Preventive Health Strategy (NPHS) prioritises seven focus areas: tobacco and nicotine, healthy diet, physical activity, cancer screening, immunisation, alcohol and other drugs, and mental health. The readiness of community members in Australia to address health behaviours relating to these areas has not been fully examined. In response, six focus groups were conducted with 27 adults from the Australian general population to explore their perspectives and experiences of preventive health information and behaviours relating to the seven NPHS focus areas. Themes and sub-themes were identified using an applied descriptive framework. Participants described motivations, barriers and experiences surrounding preventive health through the themes of 'Making informed health choices', 'Facilitating behaviour change and the role of support systems' and 'Spreading the preventive health word'. Sub-themes detailed processes of prioritisation, risk-benefit assessment, critical appraisal, sociocultural influence and support-seeking to understand and personalise preventive health information, implement behavioural change, and share information with others. The focus areas participants engaged with most strongly were healthy eating and physical activity, while cancer screening was discussed less often. These findings indicate high preventive health engagement in the Australian community, alongside challenges navigating and adapting relevant information to personal needs. These insights can support policymakers, healthcare providers and others to effectively enact the NPHS through more targeted preventive health information and care delivery.

Purpose Despite the high documented prevalence of hunger and poor mental health in adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in South Africa, this relationship remains understudied, with existing studies limited by their cross-sectional designs. This longitudinal study aimed to identify the association of hunger trajectories with anxiety and depressive symptoms, and hope in AGYW. Methods We used secondary data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) -068 conducted in rural Agincourt, South Africa. Complete data from 1779 AGYW collected at baseline (2011/12) and three annual follow-up visits were used. Hunger trajectories, measured using the Household Hunger Scale, were estimated via Group-Based Trajectory Modelling. Self-reported incident anxiety and depressive symptoms and hope were assessed based on AGYWs last two follow-up visits. Covariate adjusted modified Poisson regression models estimated the association between hunger trajectories and incident anxiety symptoms, incident depressive symptoms, and hope. Results Moderate-severe hunger was prevalent in 11.0%, 10.8%, and 6.0% of the households at baseline, follow-up 1, and 2, respectively. Incident anxiety symptoms were reported by 4.5%, incident depressive symptoms by 20.0% and hopelessness by 52.8% of the AGYW. Two hunger trajectories were identified- no hunger (82%) and marginal hunger (18%). Hunger trajectories were not associated with incident anxiety symptoms [RR:1.09, 95% CI: 0.55, 2.18], incident depressive symptoms [RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.33] nor hope [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.23] in AGYW. Conclusion Better understanding of the factors that promote resiliency and mental health of AGYW in this setting is warranted to inform the design of interventions.

Importance: Chronic stress may contribute to adverse health outcomes through cumulative physiologic dysregulation. Allostatic load (AL), a composite measure of multisystem physiologic burden, may capture biologic effects of structural, social, and psychosocial stress not reflected by self-reported measures. Objective: To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in AL among women with familial cancer risk and examine how socioeconomic status, psychosocial factors, clinical characteristics, and health behaviors contribute to variations in AL. Design: Cross-sectional study of underrepresented minority participants enrolled in the HERSTORY cohort from October 2023 through September 2025, with comparison participants from the UCLA ATLAS biobank. Setting: UCLA academic health system. Participants: The study included 303 racially and ethnically diverse female HERSTORY participants aged [≥]35 years with a family history of cancer and matched non-Hispanic White female ATLAS participants (n=709). Exposures: Race and ethnicity, age, neighborhood deprivation, cancer history and stage, depression, perceived stress, cancer worry, and physical activity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was AL, calculated from cardiometabolic and organ-function measures. A secondary index incorporated race- and ethnicity-specific neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) derived from 326,826 women in the UCLA Health population. Multivariable regression models evaluated factors associated with elevated AL. Results: Compared with matched non-Hispanic White participants, Black and Asian/Pacific Islander HERSTORY participants had significantly higher AL after adjustment. Hispanic/Latina participants did not have significantly elevated AL. Older age, greater area-level socioeconomic deprivation, and depression were independently associated with higher AL. Prior cancer diagnosis, cancer worry and perceived stress were not significantly associated with AL, whereas regular physical activity was associated with lower AL. Among cancer patients, advanced stage was associated with greater AL. Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates elevated AL among understudied racial/ethnic minority groups with familial cancer risk and identifies associations with neighborhood deprivation, depression, and physical activity. The association between cancer stage and AL suggests that physiologic stress may reflect variation in cancer burden. The lack of association with perceived stress and cancer worry further indicates that physiologic and self-reported psychosocial measures capture distinct dimensions of stress. The development of race/ethnicity-specific NLR thresholds derived from large population samples provide a benchmark for future studies.

South Asian communities in the UK experience disproportionate maternal and child health inequalities linked to non-recommended infant feeding practices, limited health literacy, and socioeconomic constraints. Participatory learning and action (PLA) is effective in low- and middle-income countries, but high-income evidence is scarce. This pilot assessed the feasibility of a community facilitator-led PLA intervention to improve infant feeding among South Asian families in East London. A three-arm pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10234623) was conducted in Tower Hamlets and Newham, East London (May-September 2022), with 12 wards randomised 1:1:1 to face-to-face PLA, online PLA, or usual care. Multilingual community facilitators delivered eight biweekly sessions over 14 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were assessed against prespecified Go/Stop criteria; exploratory outcomes included child feeding behaviours (Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, CEBQ), parental feeding style (Parental Feeding Style Questionnaire, PFSQ), and child BMI Z-scores. Of 263 enrolled participants, 261 had a recorded trial arm allocation; consent to the pilot feasibility study was 70.7% (186/263; 95% CI 65.0-75.9%) meeting the [≥]50% Go criterion. Attendance was 37% (Tower Hamlets 59%, Newham 29%), below the [≥]80% Go threshold. Six-month retention was 54.8% (Tower Hamlets 78%, Newham 48.5%; 95% CI 41.8-55.3%), triggering the Definite Stop criterion. Significant baseline imbalances included BMI Z-score (p = 0.005), ethnicity, borough, and education; no between-arm BMI differences were observed at follow-up (p = 0.249). CEBQ and PFSQ baseline completion was 24.5% and 23.0%, with no usable follow-up data. PLA Phases 3 and 4 were not completed by any group; all participants providing feedback reported it acceptable. Recruitment was feasible and the intervention acceptable, but a Definite Stop criterion was triggered in Newham, no group completed the full PLA cycle, and outcome data were insufficient for evaluation. A definitive trial requires stratified randomisation, digitised multilingual data collection, participant reimbursement, and explicit PLA phase-completion criteria.

Oregon (OR) and Colorado (CO) were the first states to enact regulations for provision of psilocybin with support of licensed "facilitators." As more states and countries adopt similar policies, informed public policy decisions require that client characteristics and rationale for using psilocybin, psilocybin dosing practices, mental health outcomes, and adverse events are understood. We performed a retrospective observational study of responses for 2363 individuals receiving psilocybin at OR and CO regulated service centers. Clients and facilitators entered data before and after receiving psilocybin, including the Mystical Experience Questionnaire-30 (MEQ-30), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and World Health Organization Well-Being Index-5 (WHO-5). Preexisting mental health issues were common (66%) in participants. Psilocybin doses ranged from 1-95 mg, with a mean total of 28*8 mg. We observed improvements of 49% in PHQ-9 scores, 51% in GAD-7 scores, and 22% in WHO-5 scores at two-weeks after dosing. MEQ-30 scores were dose-dependent. Changes in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores were not different for psilocybin doses [≤]30 mg and >30 mg, and only weakly correlated with MEQ-30 scores. There were 94 mild adverse events during and after dosing, five more serious events not clearly related to treatment, and evidence of possible risk of increased suicidality. Study limitations include open label administration, self-reporting, loss of participants for follow-up, and a short 2-week post-dosing end-point. We conclude that psilocybin services, delivered within these regulated frameworks, is associated with improvements in mental health in real world populations, however, more robust monitoring is needed to ensure safety.

Background: Rising rates of young people Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET) in the UK have recently coincided with declining youth physical and mental health but no study has asked whether this reflects a growing proportion of young people with health problems (prevalence) or those with health problems becoming more likely to be NEET (penalty). Methods: Using 15 years of Understanding Society data (2009-23), we analysed 15,242 respondents aged 16-24 (66,160 observations). We employed three complementary approaches: descriptive trends, Blinder-Oaxaca-Kitagawa (BO) probit decomposition comparing 2009-2013 and 2019-2023 against a 2014-2018 reference period, and fixed-effects (FE) Poisson models with lagged health status. Exposures included self-reported health conditions or disability (SRHD), psychological distress , diagnosed conditions and socio-demographic factors. Findings: NEET rates were lowest in 2014-18 (10.5-11.5%) and higher in 2009-13 (12-15%) and 2019-23 (15-16%). Higher prevalence of SRHD, psychological distress, diagnosed depression and multimorbidity explained changes in NEET prevalence across both the 2009-13 to 2014-2018 and 2014-18 to 2019-23 periods. No change in penalty was observed for any health variable across periods, except for an increase in the penalty for SRHD between the 2009-13 to 2014-18 periods. Interpretation: Rising NEET rates among UK youth are driven largely by more young people having physical and psychological ill health. Whilst labour market and education accommodations remain important, reducing NEET rates will require reversing the decline in youth health, not just accommodating it.

Aims To estimate the prevalence of past-year smoking quit attempts in Great Britain and examine variation by sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, mental health, alcohol use, smoking-related characteristics, and geographic area. Design Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative household survey (the Smoking Toolkit Study) conducted October 2020 to May 2026. Setting Great Britain. Participants 24,786 adults ([≥]18y) who reported past-year tobacco smoking. Measurements The outcome was self-reporting having made at least one serious attempt to stop smoking in the previous 12 months. Associations with age, gender, ethnicity, social grade, health-related economic inactivity, mental health conditions, psychological distress, alcohol consumption, use of non-combustible nicotine, cigarette type and consumption, strength of urges to smoke, and motivation to stop smoking were assessed. We calculated weighted prevalence estimates and odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for survey year. Findings Overall, 36.7% [95%CI=36.0-37.4] of adults who had smoked in the past year self-reported making at least one quit attempt. Annual prevalence was relatively stable over the study period (range: 35.5% [33.9-37.1] to 37.6% [35.9-39.3]). Making a past-year quit attempt was more common among younger adults (48.0% among 18-24-year-olds) and declined progressively with age (24.6% among [≥]65-year-olds; OR=0.35, 95%CI=0.31-0.39). Compared with White adults, making a past-year quit attempt was more common among Black (OR=1.31, 1.11-1.55) and Asian (OR=1.40, 1.21-1.62) adults. Adults with a history of diagnosed mental health conditions (OR=1.27, 1.17-1.38) and moderate (OR=1.31, 1.20-1.43) or severe psychological distress in the past month (OR=1.39, 1.25-1.56) had greater odds of reporting a past-year quit attempt than those without. Those reporting increasing/higher risk alcohol consumption had lower odds than non-drinkers (OR=0.88, 0.82-0.95). Current use of nicotine replacement therapy (OR=2.59, 2.36-2.83) and vapes (OR=2.15, 2.02-2.30) were positively associated with reporting a past-year quit attempt. Odds were lower among those with greater cigarette consumption (OR range 0.79-0.86 among those smoking >10 vs. [≤]5 cigarettes per day). Motivation to stop smoking showed the strongest gradient (OR range 2.95-29.09). Geographic differences were modest, with prevalence ranging from 32.1% [29.9-34.3] in Wales to 39.4% [35.9-43.1] in North East England. Conclusions Between 2020 and 2026, around one in three adults in Great Britain who smoked in the past year reported making a serious attempt to quit, corresponding to approximately 3.5 million people annually. Making a past-year quit attempt was more strongly associated with smoking-related factors than sociodemographic characteristics.

Background: Ebola virus disease is a life-threatening illness caused by the Ebolavirus, with symptoms manifesting two to twenty-one days after infection. Although Uganda has faced multiple Ebola outbreaks, many patients survive only to encounter persistent challenges. Therefore, this study explored the post-discharge experiences of survivors following the 2022 Ebola Virus Disease outbreak in Uganda. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study comprising of in-depth participant interviews was conducted at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital in central Uganda. Interviews were face-to-face and data were analyzed manually by inductive content analysis. Ten male and female participants were Ebola Virus Disease survivors in Mubende district who had lived in the community for at least six months post-discharge from the Ebola Treatment Unit. Results: Four themes emerged: (i) Psychosocial Burdens and Social Exclusion, (ii) Economic Hardship and Loss of Financial Stability, (iii) Chronic Physical and Health Burdens Post-Recovery and (iv) Rebuilding Lives: Psychological, Social, and Medical Pathways to Recovery. Survivors faced significant emotional burdens such as survivor guilt, grief, trauma from loss, and anxiety about transmission risks. They experienced social isolation, stigma, and discrimination, which often led to their exclusion from community activities. Financially, they struggled with debt and the loss of livelihoods, compounded by ongoing health issues. Additionally, survivors endured chronic physical complications, including pain and fatigue, which hindered their recovery. Despite these challenges, survivors sought psychological, social, and medical pathways to recovery, including confirmation of their recovery, support from family and organizations, and health maintenance practices. Supportive medical care and community assistance were crucial in their physical and emotional rehabilitation. Conclusion: Ebola Virus Disease survivors in Uganda face significant psychosocial, health, social, and economic challenges post-discharge. The findings highlight the critical need for comprehensive medical and community-based support systems to aid survivors' recovery and well-being. Further research on long-term neurological effects and community reintegration programmes is needed to inform targeted interventions that support Ebola survivors and reduce stigma and discrimination.

Background: Young people who are Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET) represent a major public health and societal challenge. Existing evidence has linked adolescent mental health problems and health risk behaviours to NEET but has largely treated NEET as a static, rather than longitudinal outcome and overlooked the combined effects of multiple health conditions. Methods: Using data from 5,262 participants born between 1993 and 2000 in the UK Household Longitudinal Study, this study examined the independent and combined associations of adolescent mental health problems (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity) and health risk behaviours (regular smoking, drug use, alcohol use, and high social media use) with ever-NEET status, NEET chronicity, and NEET trajectories from ages 16 to 24, using modified Poisson, proportional odds, and multilevel logistic regression models, respectively. Findings: All mental health problems were associated with ever-NEET status (RRs 1.24-1.27) and NEET chronicity (ORs 1.41-1.98); emotional symptoms showed a widening disadvantage with age, while the disadvantages associated with conduct problems and hyperactivity remained stable. Among health risk behaviours, regular smoking showed the strongest and most persistent relationships with NEET (ever-NEET RR 1.54; chronicity OR 1.64); drug use was related to ever-NEET status (RR 1.37) and an increasing disadvantage after age 21-22, while alcohol use and social media use showed limited associations. NEET risk generally increased with the number of co-occurring conditions, but for recurrent NEET (three or more occasions), risk was only elevated at three or more co-occurring conditions. Interpretation: Adolescent health exposures were associated with NEET risk during ages 16-24, but the strength and pattern varied by exposure and outcome, offering potential insights into the timing and emphasis of any interventions.